Underworld Unrated Extended Director's Cut (2003) 1080p 5.1 BDRip x264 High Quality - Judasseeders: 4
leechers: 1
Underworld Unrated Extended Director's Cut (2003) 1080p 5.1 BDRip x264 High Quality - Judas (Size: 10.3 GB)
Description
Underworld
[FORMAT]:........[ MP4 x264 VBR 9,750 kb/s (High@L4.1) {CRF Placebo} [SETTINGS]:......[ SUBME=11 (Full RD) / ME=TESA {SATD Exhaustive} [FILE SIZE]:.....[ 10.2GB [RESOLUTION]:....[ 1920x816 [FRAME RATE]:....[ 23.976 fps [AUDIO STREAM 1]:[ AC-3 5.1 Surround 384 kb/s 48khz {DD5.1} [AUDIO STREAM 2]:[ AAC 5.1 Surround 960 kb/s 48khz (AAC/LC) {2-Pass} [LANGUAGE]:......[ English [SUBTITLES]:.....[ English (SRT File) [RUNTIME]:.......[ 2Hr 13Min 37Sec (134 Minutes) [CHAPTERS].......[ YES [SOURCE].........[ 1080p Physical Retail Blu-ray Region 1|A NOTE: It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that you TRY the 2nd audio track to experience a better audio experience if your system supports it properly. A valid media player or device MUST have the ability to allow you to switch audio stream/tracks such as VLC or most smart tvs. The primary AC-3 AKA DD5.1 audio track is provided for MAXIMUM surround sound capability and for pure bitstreaming support for those without AAC5.1-7.1 playback abilities, are restricted to using a digital connection using fiber/toslink/coax/spdif and doesn't have realtime dolby digital live or dts-connect abilities. Additionally advantages of the AC-3 stream is flawless direct realtime downmixing to all stereo devices without any potential decoding issues anywhere along the line, be it using laptop/headphones or a dedicated stereo amplifier, it should reproduce very well. Those with 6/7/8 Channel HDMI using LPCM or direct analog connections, you should be fully capable of playing the 2nd stream to experience a full audio spectrum version of the movie. DTS-HD is incapable of provided more than 5.1 audio @ 1536kbps, AAC5.1 @ 960kbps or AAC7.1 @ 1280kbps should be unparalleled in terms of quality while providing the additional channels in the event of a movie being 6.1 or 7.1. Screenshot Previews: http://imageshack.com/a/img707/8938/ft1z.png http://imageshack.com/a/img24/692/vsyf.png http://imageshack.com/a/img17/6607/0if1.png http://imageshack.com/a/img856/8017/md6r.png http://imageshack.com/a/img819/5733/ft0c.png http://imageshack.com/a/img607/4748/zcr7.png http://imageshack.com/a/img713/4719/q823.png http://imageshack.com/a/img706/4214/l52q.png http://imageshack.com/a/img829/6555/ek27.png http://imageshack.com/a/img15/2115/qzdu.png Please, be patient with seeding... Enjoy ;) Feel free to give a thumbs up and a comment, and if you have any issues, concerns or dislikes, be constructive and leave a comment about that too! Thank You! Judas's Note: Time to get the best bang for the bit in audio too, Can't really get any better than this for an MP4. This is a pristine version that is frame for frame perceptually indifferent from the bluray itself. The bluray itself has plenty of grain in it, and this HQ version reproduces what you'd see on the bluray. The quality and the Dark is fantastic. Everyone should be pleasantly pleased with the results. Related Torrents
Sharing WidgetTrailerScreenshots All Comments |
Requests:
1) If adding a Dolby audio track stick to the max quality that is 640Kbps or else it's a waste of the effort
OR
Add a dts audio track as almost every latest player in the world is compatible with dts.
2) Instead of AAC use FLAC which will give you pure lossless sound with small file size when max compression is used. AAC bitrate of more than 448kbps is even less supported by newer standalone players than FLAC.
All in all thanks.
2) As previously answered, why in the world would ANYONE anywhere favor flac over the original source, if i was really trying to recapture the perfect possible audio, i'd leave the original track in it's original state, no point in WASTING space with a flac conversion, it's completely ridiculous to convert a TrueHD file to flac.. or any of them.... Go from a 3GB trueHD or DTS Master file to 6GB or larger for flac... don't be silly. Additionally AAC has been adopted as a new standard for HDMI 2.0 compliance, this include the 5.1 and 7.1 channel AAC/LC spec with newer amplifiers that comply with it supporting it. In fact i see more AAC2.0 supported receivers available then anything with flac on it, and the nice thing about AAC is the regardless of channel count, provided the decoders used follow the rules, they are intended to downmix to stereo relatively well, granted not ideal. But that's beside the point as we aren't going to be bitstreaming AAC until it's fully supported, at which point any HDMI or Analog connect 5.1 or 7.1 audio system using a proper player will read 5.1 and 7.1 AAC files perfectly fine.
BTW The container "mp4" only technically supports AAC primarily along with AC-3 as a secondary choice for the most part... DTS and TRUEHD are not compliant nor is flac.
The idea is to give a VERY good compression ratio, with fairly transparent sound and video quality for easy archiving for a fairly high quality result. If you really want anything better, you'd be better off download the real Bluray itself, otherwise there is no point. The 960kbps AAC is arugeably as good if not potentially better than the DTS Core.. and it's much better when it provides 7.1 audio (which the dts core cannot provide).
> AAC is a very impressive codec but still no match for lossless. As far as compatibility goes you always include the Dolby track so no need to worry. I have time and again compared Dolby 640 with 384 etc. and the only one that comes close is 448Kbps. But if you have a good system, Dolby 640Kbps is almost identical to dts 1.5Mbps in sound reproduction (except for the intended attenuation) with less than 50% of file size.
Remember, this is the age of Hi-Def video and sound hence the request. A few more Gbs won't hurt.
But, I do realize and understand your personal preferences.
Thanks once again.
you can thank