The Matrix Trilogy HDDVD FASM X264 720p PROPER

___________________________________________________________________________

__________$$$$$$$_____$$$___________________$$$$$$$___$$$____$$$___________

_________$$$$$$$_____$$$$$_________________$$$$$$$___$$_$$__$$_$$__________

________$$__________$$___$$_______________$$________$$___$$$$___$$_________

_______$$__________$$_____$$_____________$$________$$_____$$_____$$________

______$$$$$_______$$$$$$$$$$$___________$$$$$$$___$$______________$$_______

_____$$$$$_______$$$$$$$$$$$$$_________$$$$$$$___$$________________$$______

____$$__________$$___________$$___________$$____$$__________________$$_____

___$$__________$$_____________$$_________$$____$$____________________$$____

__$$__________$$_______________$$___$$$$$$____$$______________________$$___

_$$__________$$_________________$$_$$$$$$____$$________________________$$__

___________________________________________________________________________

_______________You`ll find it where_QUALITY_meets_low_space________________





p r o u d l y p r e s e n t s



Compilation name ..........: The Matrix X264 FASM 720p PROPER

Source ....................: HDDVD

Video Format ..............: MPEG4 AVC HIGH PROFILE LEVEL 3.1

Audio Format ..............: AAC HE

File Container ............: MP4

Video Aspect Ratio ........: 16:9 (cropped 2.35:1 - no black bars)

Video Attributes ..........: 23.976 fps 1280x720 @ 1245 kbit/s

Video Commpresion Technique: FASM X264 VIDEO TECHNIQUE 12

Video quality .............: YOU WILL NOT BELIVE YOUR EYES

Audio Attributes ..........: 207 kbit/s 5.1 from EAC3 source

Audio Commpresion Technique: FASM AAC AUDIO TECHNIQUE 3.0

Audio Quality .............: YOU WILL NOT BELIVE YOUR EARS

Subtitles .................: Polish

Language ..................: English

Compilation size ..........: 1/3 DVD 4.7GB

Lenght ....................: 2:16:17

Sample.....................: JPG

Movie info.................: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/



Compilation name ..........: The Matrix Reloaded X264 FASM 720p PROPER

Source ....................: HDDVD

Video Format ..............: MPEG4 AVC HIGH PROFILE LEVEL 3.1

Audio Format ..............: AAC HE

File Container ............: MP4

Video Aspect Ratio ........: 16:9 (cropped 2.35:1 - no black bars)

Video Attributes ..........: 23.976 fps 1280x720 @ 1288 kbit/s

Video Commpresion Technique: FASM X264 VIDEO TECHNIQUE 12

Video quality .............: YOU WILL NOT BELIVE YOUR EYES

Audio Attributes ..........: 209 kbit/s 5.1 from EAC3 source

Audio Commpresion Technique: FASM AAC AUDIO TECHNIQUE 3.0

Audio Quality .............: YOU WILL NOT BELIVE YOUR EARS

Subtitles .................: Polish

Language ..................: English

Compilation size ..........: 1/3 DVD 4.7GB

Lenght ....................: 2:18:15

Sample.....................: JPG

Movie info.................: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0234215/




Compilation name ..........: The Matrix Revolutions X264 FASM 720p PROPER

Source ....................: HDDVD

Video Format ..............: MPEG4 AVC HIGH PROFILE LEVEL 3.1

Audio Format ..............: AAC HE

File Container ............: MP4

Video Aspect Ratio ........: 16:9 (cropped 2.35:1 - no black bars)

Video Attributes ..........: 23.976 fps 1280x720 @ 1493 kbit/s

Video Commpresion Technique: FASM X264 VIDEO TECHNIQUE 12

Video quality .............: YOU WILL NOT BELIVE YOUR EYES

Audio Attributes ..........: 214 kbit/s 5.1 from EAC3 source

Audio Commpresion Technique: FASM AAC AUDIO TECHNIQUE 3.0

Audio Quality .............: YOU WILL NOT BELIVE YOUR EARS

Subtitles .................: Polish

Language ..................: English

Compilation size ..........: 1/3 DVD 4.7GB

Lenght ....................: 2:09:15

Sample.....................: JPG

Movie info.................: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0242653/




Here goes another super quality rerelease of this Trilogy. Its reposted because FASM 12 put the quality on another level and this trilogy is worth it. To see how much the quality improved visit

http://comparescreenshots.slicx.com/comparison/9374




Current movie releases are like American muscle car. It has enormous horse power derived from its huge engine and it consumes a lot of fuel. Of course it is fast like hell.



My releases are like JAPAN small engine car packed with those super duper efficiency optimizers like VTEC, VVTI and whatever you imagine electronic extras. It is also fast like hell, but in direct competition he will loose to pure horse power derived from engine size. It is still much faster than similar cars and consumes only 1/3 of fuel than its bigger brother.



My method is constantly improved. Its latest version has number 12 providing perfect bitrate management not only within frame, or movie, but for different movies put together on single DVD. Its like VTEC-infinite If you have downloaded something before It is worth a try to download this again to see the difference.



The name FASM was derived from assembler efficiency. If you write something directly in assembler it is usually much faster and takes much less size, than the same thing written in C, Java etc…

It also means FAchman SoofMan - founders of FASM :)



You have 16:9 screen size because:

1. I do not want to compete with other releases who uses the original Aspect ratio. They have done great job and I have respect for them. There is no point in delivering something others have before.

2. I have panoramic 16:9 monitor and I prefer to fill it with movie not black bars and I do not find anything so much important in those cutted scenes.

3. Cropped 16:9 would give you the feeling of the size of TV 32" on monitor 23"



Video commpression is not something you can understand by simple rules, it is rather choosing of the lesser of two evils .

I will give you the example:

1. Does 1280×540 encoding would give slight better quality than 1280×720 at the same bitrate??? YES

2. Can the 1280×720 even with initial lower quality look better than 1280×540?? YES!!!!



To proove it to you I have prepared small comparision.

http://comparescreenshots.slicx.com/comparison/9317




In the first picture you will see the original HD DVD disk resized according to your suggestions to 1280×540 (2.35:1), then cropped to 960×540 (as you say good player can do to remove black bars), then resized back to 1280×720 (as the graphics card would do)

Suprized to see that my encodes have better quality than original after your suggested moves????

Do you know why is that???

1. By downsizing the picture you have ABSOLUTE LOSS of detail.

2. By commpressing the picture you DO NOT have to loose anything. It just depends on encoder, what and how much is lost.

3. Oversizing the picture blurries the details, but you enjoy it everytime you use Fullscreen.



One of the reason my encodes have so good quality is because I use as the source exactly 79% of original 1080p pixels. If I would as you suggest keep the original aspect ratio, my source would contain only 50% of original pixels. That would mean I decided to loose the detail at the very begining.



You have a simple choice. Want the original Aspect ratio, download others work, want 16:9 download mine.



Regards to true scene members and disregard to lamers.