The Dark Knight Rises (2012) 1080p 5.1 BDRip x264 High Quality - Judasseeders: 30
leechers: 10
The Dark Knight Rises (2012) 1080p 5.1 BDRip x264 High Quality - Judas (Size: 14.18 GB)
Description
The Dark Knight Rises
[FORMAT]:........[ MP4 x264 VBR 11,000 kb/s (High@L4.1) {CRF Placebo} [SETTINGS]:......[ SUBME=11 (Full RD) / ME=TESA {SATD Exhaustive} [FILE SIZE]:.....[ 14.1GB [RESOLUTION]:....[ 1920x1080 [FRAME RATE]:....[ 23.976 fps [AUDIO STREAM 1]:[ AC-3 5.1 Surround 384 kb/s 48khz {DD5.1} [AUDIO STREAM 2]:[ AAC 5.1 Surround 960 kb/s 48khz (AAC/LC) {2-Pass} [LANGUAGE]:......[ English [SUBTITLES]:.....[ English (SRT File) [RUNTIME]:.......[ 2Hr 44Min 33Sec (165 Minutes) [CHAPTERS].......[ YES [SOURCE].........[ 1080p Physical Retail Blu-ray Region 1|A NOTE: It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that you TRY the 2nd audio track to experience a better audio experience if your system supports it properly. A valid media player or device MUST have the ability to allow you to switch audio stream/tracks such as VLC or most smart tvs. The primary AC-3 AKA DD5.1 audio track is provided for MAXIMUM surround sound capability and for pure bitstreaming support for those without AAC5.1-7.1 playback abilities, are restricted to using a digital connection using fiber/toslink/coax/spdif and doesn't have realtime dolby digital live or dts-connect abilities. Additionally advantages of the AC-3 stream is flawless direct realtime downmixing to all stereo devices without any potential decoding issues anywhere along the line, be it using laptop/headphones or a dedicated stereo amplifier, it should reproduce very well. Those with 6/7/8 Channel HDMI using LPCM or direct analog connections, you should be fully capable of playing the 2nd stream to experience a full audio spectrum version of the movie. DTS-HD is incapable of provided more than 5.1 audio @ 1536kbps, AAC5.1 @ 960kbps or AAC7.1 @ 1280kbps should be unparalleled in terms of quality while providing the additional channels in the event of a movie being 6.1 or 7.1. Screenshot Previews: http://imageshack.com/a/img401/4981/189a.png http://imageshack.com/a/img838/2380/e4gh.png http://imageshack.com/a/img89/1754/h8dk.png http://imageshack.com/a/img577/6522/b2zk.png http://imageshack.com/a/img28/1497/nq9y.png http://imageshack.com/a/img194/5861/d3zq.png http://imageshack.com/a/img856/4306/tbmo.png http://imageshack.com/a/img545/4790/2f7w.png http://imageshack.com/a/img809/2254/7ec5.png http://imageshack.com/a/img35/1095/a5xf.png Please, be patient with seeding... Enjoy ;) Feel free to give a thumbs up and a comment, and if you have any issues, concerns or dislikes, be constructive and leave a comment about that too! Thank You! Judas's Note: Time to get the best bang for the bit in audio too, Can't really get any better than this for an MP4. Sharing WidgetTrailerScreenshots All Comments |
Yes this torrent is IMAX.... there wasn't a bluray version released without imax scenes. (as I stated)
DVD era has long since mostly died.. there are VERY few that actively use dvds let alone burns them.... they are near impossible to come by, and the few that do still sell them are liquidating stock, and usually are coaster more than actual useful dvds.
Setting specific bitrate limits/file sizes to be hit has an adverse effect on the overall quality, it has several names, but basically you'd have a hour and a half film with twice the bitrate of a 3 hour film if you had a target size of 4.37gb. It is best to keep a "steady" consistant bitrate that holds a common quality value rather than completely being unpredictable.
AC-3 under 384kbps is trash. Anything at or below 640kbps for AAC isn't that great, you'd be better off with 384kbps ac3, AAC dominates @ 768kbps and above, it pretty much matches if not trumps DTS-HD 1536kbps @ the 960kbps (5.1) or 1280kbps (7.1) mark and above.
I'm not going to make a mess of creating external audio files and then complicating it for other users to potential mess up by keeping them together.
There are a lot of people that archive the BIG HQ versions of this movie... myself included... Space is not a problem like it may have been 3+ years ago, now you can get TONS of space for cheap cheap, I could even store raw blurays themselves exceeding 40gb per movie, but I've done so many tests that my current HQ are basically 99.9% indistinguishable from the original bluray physical disk. Took awhile and 100's of hours of encoding to find the sweet spot though.
I said I may consider a MQ encode, somewhere between the current LQ and HQ versions... but as it stands, I simply don't have the bandwidth for it.
BTW CRF < multi pass encoding.... CRF is superior, granted it may take several encodes to hit the desired average bitrate/file size, but the results are MUCH better than any fixed maximum bitrate encode out there 2 or 3 or n passes long.
I applaud the constructive criticism.