HPS Panzer Campaigns Kursk 43

Attempts to portray the Eastern Front Battle of Kursk. Some of the criticism levied at the user interface of the series has been addressed in this game: a fast AI option, avoiding some dialog boxes, and locating units by coordinates. The Wargamer review also analyzed the historical accuracy of the game. Although there are some discrepancies between various historian's accounts of this battle (in particular with respect to losses, see the article on the battle for details), the book of David Glantz and Jonathan House was taken as reference.

The reviewer analyzed several scenarios in details, and concluded that "with the exception of overrating Soviet air power early in the battle, this game is extremely accurate." Rating the level of fun in the game, he found that "scenarios with fewer than 40 turns and with relatively small numbers of units are engrossing", and suggested that players only try the larger ones afterwards. This recommendation was echoed by Computer Games Magazine.

PC Gamer similarly found that that "firmly grounded on prodigious research, this game is surely the definitive Kursk simulation, and one of the finest titles this prolific designer has ever given us.