Evolutionists Gang Up On and Harass Calvinistic Christians on Yahoo Answers and Wikipedia - Update 2

UPDATED: Note that this is the second update of this collection of files showing how Yahoo! Answers and Wikipedia are controlled by Darwinist moderators and administrators who are fine with allowing Christians to be personally attacked and banned, ESPECIALLY Calvinists (or as they may prefer to be called Calvinistic which is more appropriate since it doesn't imply that they follow Calvin over Christ).

More evidence has been included (really obvious evidence) that novangelis, a member of Yahoo! Answers and Wikipedia, has been stalking and harassing Starfire777 (a creationist) and anyone he associates as having helped him or defended him against his harassment. He demonstrates strong jealousy which is clear since he is clearly tracking the edits made by the users that oppose him and then overwriting their edits with his own, especially when he suspects it has something to do with religion or evolution. He also goes to their discussion pages to badger them, for example on Starfire777's page repeated a stupid warning about signing posts, which Novangelis repeated apparently, because it included the comment "it is considered poor etiquette" which to him was a fine way to sneak in an insult without it looking like one. If that isn't stalking, harassing, or childishly immature, then what is?

The records are also more organized and new information is contained showing how easy it is to use Wikipedia as a propaganda tool, and part of this evidence also comes from one of Wikipedia's own entries (so a Wikipedia member would have to make a blatant cover up to hide this fact which I doubt they would do since that might draw even more attention to this fact).

New documentation on who Starfire777 is has been included and the recent persecution of him on Wikipedia. His contributions and discussion history have been blanked out by an unknown member of Wikipedia apparently in order to prevent anyone from realizing Starfire was right about Darwinists on Wikipedia ganging up on him, helping Novangelis who is an obvious anti-christian troll, and using Wikipedia for Darwinist propaganda. If you don't believe it look at the evidence yourself, it is undeniable documentation.

Novangelis doesn't want you to see these previous entries to his discussion pages, nor do his friends (and notice how no one is able to refute them, they just delete the warnings):

Warning 1

Warning 2

Perhaps these warnings besides tarnishing Novagelis' fake holy image is not the only reason he removes them, but also because if someone where to look at the history record of contributions of these users, that they might find out that Novangelis has been stalking and vandalizing their edits. Note how Starfire777's contributions tab has been removed as well as any discussions on his page so that no one can see this record of harassment against him. Why did these Darwinists go to such extreme lengths? Does anyone know of any case where such a thing has been done when a user has not been cursing, vandalizing, but has instead been making valid contributions?

Notice in the edit history of this stalker Novangelis' discussion page that he has accuses Kyle of being "uncivil" and using that personal attack (as Darwinists love to call them) as an excuse to remove Kyle's appropriate warning yet Novangelis clearly has no problem repeatedly harassing Christians. Clearly what Novangelis considers uncivil, is disagreeing with his views on religion and evolution, and rebuking him for his harassment.

And can any Darwinists, evolutionists or anti-Calvinists explain why THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL of any of these harassed users having edited pages on Wikipedia that Novangelis or his Darwinist helpers first answered? Why only does the history of these users show that Novangelis and Darwinists have been following them around and reverting or vandalizing their edits? So who are the ones doing the stalking, let alone obsessive stalking? What does the evidence show? Can anyone show any evidence of Calvinists answering on the same questions that Novangelis answered first merely to vote him down and put him in a bad light? Show evidence for this if you can.

Note also that Kyle did warn the administrator that Novangelis was trolling but the administrator chose not to listen. Would anyone else like to bring it to the administrator's attention? Use this link and give them the link to this page.