12 Angry men (Henry Fonda) multisubs (Widescreen edition)

In English, subtitles are included in German, French, English (for the

hearing impaired) Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch and Swedish. The first two

mentioned above are also DivX embedded, while all have srt subtitle files

separately available in the subtitles folder included on this torrent.



Real lovely picture quality and great sound too.



12 Angry men is one of the most important courtroom/juryroom dramas

ever to come out of the United states. The question presented to us

in this great movie offerings is this: Is there justice in the level

of discourse that is being offered. Is the articulation on the issues

in fact valid or is it semantic like argument on feigns of dubious

validity. If a case appears as it should: "open and shut" - is that

reason enough to start to discount it? Should you decide that everything

that could go the other way hypothetically, no matter how remote the

possibility, that should be the order of the day of a particular brand

of "more pure" justice? Should the prejudices carried by members of the

jury or testifying witnesses be reason enough to negate and retard their

testimony? should they be required as jury members to vote the other side

instead? The OJ Simpson criminal trial contained all of these elements

in the minds of those who assembled not too long ago on a PBS panel inquiry

headed by talkshow Mr. Charlie Rose The ownership of property in and of

itself should never be sufficient qualification to sit on a jury to decide

the fate of members of the community. Instead, a sound grounding in values

that are humanistically pure and demonstrably so, combined with sound reasoning

skills and experience in the proper and right application of legal principles

that come from this sound philosophical basis should rule, and be the

requirement.



So a panel of judges perhaps, appointed on more than their connections within

legal circles as it presently is comprised, rather on an open contest in which

real votes for merit may be clearly exercised in the protection of all.



Otherwise, we could someday die for no other reason than a lack of restraint in

the environment caused by a complete breakdown in the expectation of justice

based on jury members that are nothing more than proxies for those that would

inflict their own brand of justice instead. The OJ Simspon affair should raise

just such alarm bells as the second trial rightly pointed out, however it came

too late to impose penalties to fit the crime - financial constraints that were

imposed subsequently on the defendant could hardly be deemed sane enough for

anyone that was looking in at the situation in objective fashion unable to do

nothing but "shake their heads" in amazement that this could go on without a

public scream that should never end until the righter outcome is seen through

instead.



Michael Rizzo Chessman

Please see my movie reviews at moviesbyrizzo.info